{"id":39,"date":"2014-06-16T06:59:47","date_gmt":"2014-06-16T06:59:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/demo.swebdesignstudio.com\/themes\/lex\/?page_id=39"},"modified":"2020-01-09T21:24:20","modified_gmt":"2020-01-09T21:24:20","slug":"case-results","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/case-results\/","title":{"rendered":"CASE RESULTS"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

OUR CASE RESULTS<\/h2>\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Ehrlich v. Culver City<\/strong><\/p>

  • August 29, 2014<\/li>
  • 12 Cal.4th 858 (1996)<\/li>
  • (taking challenge)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
    \n\t\t\t\t\t

    Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes<\/strong><\/p>

    • August 29, 2014<\/li>
    • 82 Cal. App.4th 511(2000)<\/li>
    • Friends of Mammoth<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
      \n\t\t\t\t\t

      Beach-Courchesue v. City of Diamond Bar<\/strong><\/p>

      • August 29, 2014<\/li>
      • 80 Cal.App.4th 388 (2000)<\/li>
      • (redevelopment plan invalidation)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
        \n\t\t\t\t\t

        Wagner v. City of South Pasadena<\/strong><\/p>

        • August 29, 2014<\/li>
        • 78 Cal.App.4th 943, 93 Cal.Rptr.2d 91 (2000)<\/li>
        • (statute of limitations and method of service in challenge to land use actions)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
          \n\t\t\t\t\t

          City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company<\/strong><\/p>

          • August 29, 2014<\/li>
          • 51 Cal.App.4th 1410 (1997)<\/li>
          • (amicus-utilities) (stipulated judgment relief)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
            \n\t\t\t\t\t

            Castaic Lake Water Agency v. City of Santa Clarita<\/strong><\/p>

            • August 29, 2014<\/li>
            • 41 Cal.App.4th 257 (1995)<\/li>
            • emergency exemptions from CEQA<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
              \n\t\t\t\t\t

              Lancaster Redevelopment Agency v. Dibley<\/strong><\/p>

              • August 29, 2014<\/li>
              • 20 Cal.App.4th 656 (1995)<\/li>
              • (low\/moderate housing funds)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                \n\t\t\t\t\t

                Gemtel Corp. v. Community Redevelopment Agency<\/strong><\/p>

                • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                • 23 Fed.3d 1542 (9th Cir. 1994)<\/li>
                • (inverse condemnation)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                  \n\t\t\t\t\t

                  A.L.A.R.M. v. City of Los Angeles<\/strong><\/p>

                  • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                  • 12 Cal.App.4th 1773 (1993)<\/li>
                  • (environmental & general plan challenge)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                    \n\t\t\t\t\t

                    Lippman v. City of Los Angeles<\/strong><\/p>

                    • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                    • 234 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1991)<\/li>
                    • (Citizen Participation)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                      \n\t\t\t\t\t

                      Morgan v. Community Redevelopment Agency<\/strong><\/p>

                      • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                      • 231 Cal.App.3d 243 (1991)<\/li>
                      • (redevelopment plan adoption)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                        \n\t\t\t\t\t

                        Redevelopment Agency of Riverside County v. Superior Court,<\/strong><\/p>

                        • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                        • 228 Cal.App.3d 1487 (1991)<\/li>
                        • (exhaustion of administrative remedies)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                          \n\t\t\t\t\t

                          Arcadia Redevelopment Agency v. Ikemoto<\/strong><\/p>

                          • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                          • 10 Cal.App.4th 437 (1991)<\/li>
                          • (property tax methods and levies)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                            \n\t\t\t\t\t

                            Emmington v. Solano County<\/strong><\/p>

                            • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                            • 195 Cal.App.3d 491 (1987)<\/li>
                            • (redevelopment plan adoption)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                              \n\t\t\t\t\t

                              Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek<\/strong><\/p>

                              • August 29, 2014<\/li>
                              • 193 Cal.App.3d 249 (1987)<\/li>
                              • (amicus-eminent domain)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                Blue v. City of Los Angeles<\/strong>
                                Los Angeles<\/em><\/p>

                                • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                • 137 Cal.App.4th 1131 (2006)<\/li>
                                • blight finding required for amendment to extend power of eminent domain; raw data regarding blight not required to be included in administrative record<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                  \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                  Bernardi v. City Council of the City of Los Angeles<\/strong><\/p>

                                  • City of Los Angeles<\/li>
                                  • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                  • 54 Cal.App.4th 426, 63 Cal.Rptr2d 347 (1997)<\/li>
                                  • jurisdiction<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                    \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                    Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hawthorne v. Force Electronics<\/strong>
                                    Court of Appeals New York<\/em><\/p>

                                    • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                    • 55 Cal.App.4th 622, 64 Cal.Rptr2d 209 (1997)<\/li>
                                    • deadline for payment of eminent domain judgment<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                      \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                      Dusek v. Anaheim Redevelopment Agency<\/strong><\/p>

                                      • Los Angeles<\/li>
                                      • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                      • 173 Cal.App.3d 1029 (1985)<\/li>
                                      • CEQA<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                        \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                        Redevelopment Agency of Burbank v. Gilmore<\/strong><\/p>

                                        • Los Angeles<\/li>
                                        • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                        • 38 Cal.3d 790 (1985)<\/li>
                                        • amicus-eminent domain<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                          \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                          Creighton v. Revitsky<\/strong><\/p>

                                          • Los Angeles<\/li>
                                          • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                          • 171 Cal. App. 3d 1225 (1985)<\/li>
                                          • elections<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                            \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                            Kane v. Hidden Hills<\/strong><\/p>

                                            • Los Angeles<\/li>
                                            • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                            • 179 Cal App.3d 899 (1986)<\/li>
                                            • exhaustion of administrative remedies<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                              \n\t\t\t\t\t

                                              Community Redevelopment Agency v. Bloodgood<\/strong><\/p>

                                              • Los Angeles<\/li>
                                              • June 16, 2014<\/li>
                                              • 182 Cal.App.3d 342 (1986)<\/li>
                                              • (tax increment allocations)<\/li><\/ul>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
                                                \n\t\t\t
                                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
                                                \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"OUR CASE RESULTS Ehrlich v. Culver City August 29, 2014 12 Cal.4th 858 (1996) (taking challenge) Friends of Mammoth v. Town of Mammoth Lakes August 29, 2014 82 Cal. App.4th 511(2000) Friends of Mammoth Beach-Courchesue v. City of Diamond Bar August 29, 2014 80 Cal.App.4th 388 (2000) (redevelopment plan invalidation) Wagner v. City of South ","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=39"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":820,"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39\/revisions\/820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.kbblaw.org\/beta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=39"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}